Home  /  Applications  /  Preclinical Nuclear Imaging
Preclinical nuclear imaging

Add anatomical detail to your nuclear imaging

Support lead candidate selection with high-throughput, detailed 3D biodistribution of fluorescent candidates before you radiolabel. Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography (CFT) complements nuclear imaging by showing where signal sits within the anatomy.

Each tile opens a CFT dataset in the EMIT Viewer.
Overview

Two methods, one picture of where your compound goes

CFT is a complementary volumetric imaging technique that produces co-registered anatomical and fluorescence images in 3D at approximately 20 to 55 µm resolution. It fits into existing nuclear imaging workflows: nuclear imaging shows how a tracer distributes in living animals, and CFT adds ex vivo detail on where a fluorescent counterpart localizes within the anatomy, down to the sub-organ level. CFT is destructive, as samples are frozen and sectioned.

Before nuclear imaging

Screen a parallel cohort

Image fluorescent analogues with CFT to help prioritize candidates before you radiolabel for nuclear imaging.

After nuclear imaging

Add anatomical context

Follow nuclear imaging with CFT to see where signal localizes within organs and tissues.

How CFT complements nuclear imaging

Alongside the methods you already use

Each nuclear method answers a different question. CFT adds high-detail 3D distribution of a fluorescent counterpart, so you can screen candidates quickly and compare signal distribution across groups before choosing what to radiolabel.

Method
What it does well
What CFT adds
PET
Whole-body tracer distribution over time in living animals.
Sub-organ localization of a fluorescent counterpart, such as nerves and bone, in co-registered anatomy.
SPECT
Whole-body 3D imaging in living animals, including multiple isotopes.
Added spatial detail on tumor heterogeneity and bone-associated localization, as in the FAP case study.
Autoradiography
High-resolution signal distribution in tissue sections.
A whole-body 3D volume with anatomy, so section-level findings sit in context.
Gamma counting
Organ-level quantification of radioactivity.
Spatial distribution within organs and tissues, including on-target and off-target sites.
What CFT adds
01

See sub-organ detail.

At approximately 20 to 55 µm, CFT resolves structures within organs, including nerves and bone, that may be less apparent in nuclear imaging.

02

Co-localize signal with anatomy.

3D whole-body fluorescence with co-registered anatomy shows where signal sits relative to organs, tissues, and structures.

03

Screen quickly, compare across groups.

Whole-body, high-detail datasets let you compare signal distribution across groups to help with candidate selection before you radiolabel.

04

See your probe alongside its biology.

Visualize multiple spectrally distinct fluorescent signals in the same sample, such as a probe alongside its target, a delivery vehicle and its cargo, or a cell population.

Explore the vehicle and cargo dataset →
05

Investigate unexpected biodistribution.

Use CFT as an ex vivo endpoint to see where a fluorescent analogue or dual-labeled probe accumulates, including off-target sites.

Anatomical detail

See a tumor in its anatomical context

CFT pairs a fluorescence image with a white-light anatomical image of the same section. Here, the fluorescence image shows the tumor. Overlaying the two places the tumor next to the surrounding organs and tissues, so you can see where it sits and what it borders.

White-light anatomical image of a mouse abdominal section
Anatomical white-light
3D MIP: Fluorescence image of the pancreatic tumor
Overlay of tumor fluorescence on anatomy, with the pancreas outlined in green
Overlay: tumor fluorescence on anatomy, pancreas outlined
Case study · PSMA ligand panel

CFT screening of PSMA ligands with whole-body comparison of signal distribution

CFT screening identified a leading candidate.

Sub-organ detail in kidney and glands

Full-body, kidney, lacrimal gland, salivary gland and parotid gland CFT images for each of the four PSMA ligands

Whole-body comparison for candidate prioritization

Whole-body CFT images of four PSMA ligands, Cy5-617 8, Cy5-ZW-617 9, Cy5-ZW2-617 10 and ZW800-617 13, at 4 h post injection, showing PC3-PIP tumor, bladder, kidneys and other tissues

Whole-body CFT, 4 h post injection. PC3-PIP: PSMA+ tumor. PC3 flu: PSMA- tumor. Bl: bladder. Ki: kidney. LG: lacrimal gland. GI: gastrointestinal tract.

01
Targeting
Compound 10 preserved strong uptake in the PSMA+ tumor.
02
Differentiation across the panel
It delivered the highest tumor-to-muscle and tumor-to-head-and-neck ratios in the panel.
03
Volumetric investigation
One 3D whole-body dataset captured tumor uptake and off-target tissue retention for direct comparison.
04
Efficient screening
In under 4 weeks, researchers had a comparison of signal distribution that enabled candidate prioritization.

Tumor uptake and tumor-to-tissue ratios

Fluorescence measured in tumors and normal tissues (A), and the resulting tumor-to-tissue uptake ratios (B), compared across the four compounds.

Bar charts of quantitative fluorescence in tumor and tissues (A) and uptake ratios (B) for the four PSMA ligands

Spickschen LFV, Thünauer R, Swierzewski AJ, Van Wazer JM, Fears A, Silva MD, Thorek DLJ, Oetjen E, Maison W. J. Med. Chem. 2026;69(6):7364-7376. doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c03849

Read the publication in J. Med. Chem. →
Case study · presented at EANM 2023

FAP-targeting ligand: CFT alongside SPECT

Analogous fluorescently labeled and radiolabeled FAP-targeting compounds were studied using CFT, SPECT, and gamma counting. Broad tissue distribution was similar between CFT and SPECT. CFT added spatial detail on tumor heterogeneity and bone-associated localization.

Comparable broad biodistribution: CFT and SPECT supported similar interpretations of macro-level tissue distribution.
Additional localization insights: CFT revealed features within tumors and around bone that were less apparent in SPECT images.
A practical screening opportunity: fluorescent analogues can support earlier-stage candidate evaluation, with radiolabeled candidates then studied by nuclear imaging.
Download the case study →
FAP-targeting ligand case study comparing CFT and SPECT

The study compared analogous compounds with different labels. Any screening approach should consider whether the fluorescent label alters a compound's properties.

Who it helps

Built for teams that image with nuclear methods

Team
How CFT helps
A question to start with
Radiopharmaceutical developers
Screen fluorescent analogues before committing to radiolabeling and expanded nuclear studies.
How do you decide which compounds advance to nuclear imaging?
Preclinical imaging core facilities
Add complementary sub-organ-level 3D imaging to existing capabilities.
Which user questions need sub-organ localization beyond your current scans?
Nuclear medicine researchers
Investigate uptake heterogeneity and anatomical localization.
How do you investigate unexpected tracer uptake?
Oncology and theranostics teams
Explore tumor distribution, heterogeneity, and off-target localization.
How are you characterizing heterogeneous uptake within tumors?
CROs and imaging service providers
Expand client study options with a complementary imaging method.
Which client programs would benefit from added anatomical localization alongside nuclear imaging?

Vehicle and cargo co-localization, shown in the EMIT Viewer.

Drug delivery
Vehicle and cargo co-localization
Open
Explore Visualization Solutions →
EMIT Viewer

Explore the co-localization yourself

Open a multiplexed CFT dataset in your browser, page through slices and toggle fluorescence channels to see where each signal sits within the anatomy. Nothing to install.

Talk to a scientist

Comparing candidates or investigating unexpected biodistribution?

Tell us about your program and we will outline a small CFT pilot study.

Discover More with Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography

Contact Us