Home  /  Case Studies  /  CFT vs. In Vivo Optical
Case study · imaging comparison

Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography outperforms 2D in vivo fluorescence imaging

A comparison of 3D Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography with 2D in vivo fluorescence imaging.

CFT vs. in vivo optical imaging case study cover
Download Case Study

Unlock the full potential of Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography (CFT). In this case study, researchers from Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School showed how 2D in vivo fluorescence imaging (FLI) failed to accurately localize compounds in complex biological models, leading to misinterpretations. By integrating high-resolution, 3D imaging through CFT, the study revealed critical anatomical and molecular insights that were missed using traditional optical imaging methods.

This case study highlights CFT's superiority in sensitivity, resolution, and anatomical context compared to in vivo FLI. Learn how CFT corrected initial misinterpretations and provided reliable data in a fibrin-targeting drug study, empowering researchers to make better-informed decisions.

Get the case study

Download now

Fill out the form to access the case study!

Additional content

Discover More with Cryo-Fluorescence Tomography

Contact Us